Wrong.
It’s more like being able to tell algae what to do. “Stop producing
that chemical. Instead take this nitrate and this oxygen and make
TNT.”
Big flooded flats in Kansas like rice paddies bask in the sun. Funny
fractally-square duckweed covers the surface. Some paddies are
draining gently, slowly revealing a crystalline structure of an exotic
composite ceramic. A combine will trundle through later and collect a
single crystal forty feet long and six inches wide and strong enough
to support an entire city.
A hobbyist in his back yard will dab a DNA marker around the edge of
a broken washing machine door. He drops the door into a temporary vat
made by laying a tarp over some boards and filling it up with his
hose. He drops in some sugar, a shredded old bike tire, and then
carefully opens a packet and drops in some special yeast. In three
days he comes back to find a new rubber seal attached around the edge
of the washing machine door. He trims it to size and takes it inside.
Eventually we’ll work up genetic blueprints for specialized little
robots. The instructions will include starting soup conditions. They
will be a lot like recipes. DNA is the tip of the iceberg for a very
information dense process. The whole thing will have to be taken into
account, but we’ll move beyond raw materials and fab out whole complex
constructions, including cars, planes, robots, etc. They’ll have a
level of detail comparable with a human body or better, staying in
their fabs soaking up raw materials and sunlight for months or years.
Or they’ll be powered more directly, by sugar or corn syrup or
something. That would probably result in faster fab times. It would
also be rare for things to be fabbed completely from scratch.
Unnecessary complexity. It would be simpler to make components and
stitch them together later. Still, it would be possible to fab entire
mechanisms, and might be the only feasable approach for some things.
Things like tiny robotic flying drones, networked together, with chips
grown inside their tiny bodies like brains.
Maybe nanotech would give us the whirring swarms after all.
May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 April 2006 July 2006 September 2006 October 2006 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 April 2009 January 2010 December 2010 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 May 2012 September 2012 October 2013 January 2014 December 2014 April 2022
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]